Summum Bonem
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact

Why are there biscuits rather than nothing at all?

2/2/2018

0 Comments

 
Earlier this week I was talking to my friend Christoph on my Facebook group. We agreed that there was a need for more dogs in human philosophy.

I don't believe in grumbling without doing something about it, so this week I went to the Leeds Centre for Philosophy of Religion seminar. Both of my humans came along too. In fact one of them gave a talk about the human philosopher and theologian Herbert McCabe. Apparently it was based on this paper. (I've encountered a copy of this paper before. It tasted nice).

I was in the slides:

Picture
This was the best bit of the talk.

The reason I was in the slides is that McCabe explains his approach to the question whether God exists by talking about a dog called Fido. Many philosophers think that the question whether God exists is a bit like asking whether squirrels exist. You weigh up bits of evidence in favour (you can smell squirrels in the woods) and against (if there were squirrels, I would have caught them), and you make up your mind one way or another.

McCabe thinks that asking whether God exists is different to this. He thinks the question is best understood as being about whether it is sensible to ask why there is something rather than nothing at all. The word 'God' picks out whatever answers this question (assuming it is a good question to ask) and, according to McCabe, we cannot know what that is. The nature of God is hidden from us in this life. I like hiding too.

Whatever you make of this, I expect you'll like the way he introduces the idea:

Supposing you ask 'How come Fido?' You may be asking whether his father is Rover or whether it was that promiscuous mongrel down the lane. In such a case the answer is satisfactorily given by naming Fido's parents. At this level no more need be said; the question is fully answered at this level....

And we can go on from the level of biochemistry, to that of physics and all the time we are asking more penetrating questions concerning Fido and each time we go further in our questioning we are seeing Fido in a wider and wider context...

Now our ultimate radical question is not how come Fido exists as this dog instead of that, or how come Fido exists as a dog rather than a giraffe, or exists as living instead of inanimate, but how come Fido exists instead of nothing" (God Matters, pp. 3-5)


I think I'd like to meet this Fido. But I'd prefer to meet some squirrels even more.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Mental walkies with Lola,
    Professor of Dogic and Dogmatics at the University of Leads.

    Archives

    December 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017

    Categories

    All
    Biscuits
    Bones
    Book Reviews
    CATS
    Delicious Tempting Cheese
    Dogic
    Downward Dog
    Ducks
    Epistemology
    Marx
    Meta-ethics
    Metaphysics
    Muddy Human Challenge
    My Christmas Ambles
    My Favourite Ball
    My Feeding Bowl
    My Humans
    My Leg Ritual
    Other Dogs
    Pets As Therapy
    Philosophy Of Emotion
    Philosophy Of Gender
    Philosophy Of Language
    Philosophy Of Mathematics
    Philosophy Of Mind
    Philosophy Of Psychiatry
    Philosophy Of Religion
    Physics
    Puppies
    Slippers
    Squirrels
    Sticks
    Theology
    UCU Strike
    Wittgenstein

    RSS Feed

    FACEBOOK
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact